Boys!
This is coolbert:
The Joy of Sex - - Taliban Style??
Here are two articles that highlight the contradictions to be found within the jihadi movement and with Islamic culture at large.
Contradictions that to the western mind are both baffling and hilarious at the same time.
From the writings of the blogger Spengler:
"Jihadis and whores
By Spengler"
Iranian women being driven or forced into prostitution. Europe and the various Arab lands now abound with Iranian prostitutes??
This from a society and culture [Islamic] that portrays itself as puritanical in the extreme. NO pre-marital sex. NO adultery. NO prostitution. NO drug use or alcoholism. And CERTAINLY NO homosexuality. NO vices allowed. Especially those OF A SEXUAL NATURE!!
Extracts from the entry of Spengler:
"The proliferation of Iranian prostitutes in Western Europe as well as the Arab world helps explain the country's population trends. The European Commission's most comprehensive surveys of human trafficking found that Iranian women made up 10-15% of the prostitutes working in Belgium, the Netherlands and Italy."
"at least 300,000 women are whoring in Tehran alone."
"the number isn't so high when compared [with] the 4 million unemployed only in Tehran and the 5 million drug addicts today in Iran."
"Iranian prostitutes are living evidence of the dissolution of the traditional Muslim society that purports to shield women from degradation."
"From Jakarta to Kuala Lumpur to Sarajevo to Tirana, the criminals who trade in women overlap with jihadist networks. Prostitutes serve the terror network in a number of capacities, including suicide bombing. The going rate for a Muslim woman who can pass for a European to carry a suicide bomb currently is more than US$100,000."
There is surely a nexus here between the terrorist, ill-gotten gain through prostitution to finance jihad, smuggling of persons, drugs, weapons, etc.
And from the web site magazine, FrontPage.
Extracts from the FrontPage article:
"Just recently, the Taliban issued a new set of 30 rules to its fighters."
"But there is a curious rule that the Western media has typically ignored. Rule No. 19 instructs that Taliban fighters must not take young boys without facial hair into their private quarters."
"this new Taliban commandment brings light to a taboo pathology that underlies the structures of militant Islam. And it is crucial to deconstruct the meaning of this rule -- and the horrid reality that it represents -- because it serves as a gateway to understanding the primary causes of Islamic rage and terror."
"Rule No. 19 obviously indicates that the sexual abuse of young boys is a prevalent and institutionalized phenomenon among the Taliban."
What are we talking about here?? Sodomy, pedophilia, rape. Of boys without facial hair. NOT even teenagers. There must be a reason that the Taliban leadership promulgated this rule. They are obviously aware of something going on that they do not approve of.
SOMETHING THAT GOES AGAINST WHAT THEY PURPORT TO REPRESENT. AGAIN, THE PURITANICAL SOCIETY THAT DOES APPROVE OF ANY SEX OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE, PERIOD!!
As I have said before, jihadi heaven on earth would be to roam in the desert for forty days and nights, subsisting on bread and water, and NO WOMEN around either.
The jihadi likes to present themselves and Islam in general as being a bunch of "goody-two-shoes". Pure and moral people that lead pure and moral lives. NOT always so!! The jihadi likes to think of the west as being a moral sewer, an abomination and the the font of all evil and moral degredation on earth!! "We, the jihadi, we would never be like them!!"
Those Taliban jihadis had just better learn to zip it up. But then, they don't have zippers on those pantaloon style pants that they wear, do they!!??
[the famous Richard Francis Burton investigated the male bordellos of Karachi at the behest of the British Indian Army command [this in the 1850's]. The rumor was that British Army officers were frequent guests and patrons of these "establishments". Staffed by Muslim "pretty boys"!! Maybe somethings never change??]
coolbert.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home