Racial IV. [Conclusion]

This is coolbert:

"The party ordered me to enlist . . . on my best days I was able to take an entire battalion out of the line" - - Yevgraf Zhivago - - Bolshevik "Red" agitator, "Dr. Zhivago".

[Yevgraf of course was the brother of the famous Dr. Yuri Zhivago in the book by Boris Pasternak.]

I would even go so far to suggest that those "disturbances" at the LBJ stockade in Vietnam and the "disturbances" aboard the Kitty Hawk and Constellation were the result of "sent" communist agitators.

I have NOT SEEN ANY evidence that suggests that this is so. This is merely intuition on my part.

If anyone knows the truth about this, they are surely not saying.

But is NOT a farfetched idea. The sending of folks [professional, trained agitators and fomentors] to agitate and cause mutiny, desertion, disaffection, riotous behavior.

The communists WERE skilled at this sort of thing.

Infiltrated the Czarist army during World War One [WW1] [Yevgraf] and were successful in fomenting rebellion, mutiny, desertion.

The communist Chinese were also adept at this sort of thing during the Korean War.

Very adept. Adept in a manner that is totally inconceivable to Americans.

Would send "Red" agitators south TO BE CAPTURED BY AMERICAN FORCES. DELIBERATELY INTENDED TO BE CAPTURED. TO BE INCARCERATED IN A POW CAMP OF OTHER CHINESE PRISONERS. TO ORGANIZE THE PRISONERS FOR FURTHER RESISTANCE!!

SUCCESSFUL RESISTANCE TOO!!

SUCCESSFUL TO THE POINT OF TAKING OVER A PRISONER OF WAR CAMP, CAPTURING AN AMERICAN GENERAL AND NEGOTIATING SUCCESSFULLY DEMANDS AND CONCESSIONS!!

My suspicion would be that communist "Red" agitators enlisted in the Navy and purposefully requested duty aboard the Kitty Hawk and other aircraft carriers. To stir up trouble and cause mutiny.

It is no accident that the Forrestal and Ranger, the two ships that were supposed to replace the Kitty Hawk on Yankee Station had been sabotaged just prior to the Kitty Hawk "incident". Expertly sabotaged by someone having access, know-how, and means. The Kitty Hawk, after completing a tour on Yankee Station, instead of returning to home port, had to rearm, refuel, and head back out to the Gulf of Tonkin!! A set-up.

There is also something about the series of events aboard the Kitty Hawk that troubles me.

Events transpired in a manner eerily similar to scenes from the movie, "Battleship Potemkin". Too eerily so for my liking!

"Battleship Potemkin". The movie by Eisenstein. One of the all time greats. Students of cinema history rate this movie with "Birth of a Nation" as one of the all-time classics from the silent era.

[If you have not seen "Potemkin", rent it and see the movie. Worth doing so!]

[During the Russo-Japanese War of 1905, a mutiny DID occur on the Russian battleship Potemkin.]

The sequence of events leading to the mutiny in both cases is:

* Trouble first manifests itself regarding FOOD! Maggoty food aboard the Potemkin, poor galley service [purportedly] aboard the Kitty Hawk.

* Disgruntled agitated, mutinous sailors gather at the bow of the ship.

* Are confronted by officers backed up by Marines.

* A melee' ensues. Sailors rampage through the ship, being chased by officers.

Life imitating art?

Is that a coincidence or what? Maybe a mutiny aboard ship can occur in only a few certain ways?

I would also suggest that the mutiny at the LBJ stockade may have also been the result of "sent" agitators. Persons who enlisted or were drafted, sent to Vietnam, and committed a crime with the intention of being incarcerated. Incarceration that would allow for "agitation" of the "Red" sort.

Are the "incidents" at the LBJ stockade and aboard the Kitty Hawk the result of "Red" agitation?

Is it possible? I say yes!! Even many years later, for something like this to be made public would be dynamite and potentially very damaging.

coolbert.